It was already in use in other latitudes, where poverty is part of everyday life since she can remember. When she began to display the emerging order of the Second World War, protocol by the Bretton Woods institutions, began to crumble, they coined the term “appropriate technology” or “adequate.” It was to disqualify the massive application of technical prescriptions, compared to the application in each case the solution relevant technical. It was clear that certain technologies that were applicable to most developed countries, were counterproductive for countries that had not reached higher stages of industrialization. In recent bill is the concept of “re-engineering”, emerged from the crisis and the recession that affected the first industrialized powers, and be determined because it took to settle in our land. In broad strokes, re-engineering refers to the need for new designs to meet the new challenges which require new ways of management of enterprises and organizations. Not daring to derive from the “social engineering” to “social re-engineering”, and then it is appropriate to postulate that this “social re-engineering” is to be implemented with “appropriate technology.” And from this platform concept, we again reiterate our proposed “neo-ruralization” or “re-ruralization” of Argentina.
Our country is demographic in 1610 structured settlements that are home to ninety percent of the population. In our scheme are suggestive of human settlements around 1450 between 500 and 10,000 inhabitants. We point out the vulnerability of Greater Buenos Aires and to a much lesser extent the “big” Cordoba, Rosario. Tucuman and resistance, where only fit public policies or emergency food security, which are already under implementation.