Capitol

Capitol

UU. and to the industrial imported product users; it is an act of economic suicide. To threaten eliminating the normal commercial relations with China by means of a law of the Congress, as senator Byron Dorgan proposes (D., N.D.) it would be a tontera. It would also violate the rules of the World-wide Organization of Commerce. In the same way, the decision of the Department of Commerce of EE. UU.

to revert his old policy and to impose payments compensatory to companies Chinese, even though the Department of Commerce still classifies to China between the economies that are not of market, abrir a Box of Pandora and aggravates the protectionistic feelings of the Congress in the Capitol In its hardship to penalize to China, the Congress is turning aside the attention of the constructive actions that nation has taken and is taking to reconstruct its institutions and thus to approach economic liberalism. As Wen Jiabao in his speech in Harvard in December of 2003 said to it Prime minister, the transition of China from planning to market has taken to the gradual rise of old restrictions impropias, visible and invisible, to the liberties of the town of election of work, mobility, company, investment, information, transfer and style of life. Antecedents The economic freedom, especially in the areas costeas, has made of China the third commercial power and it has as well helped million people to leave the poverty. Without the fast expansion of the nonstate sector and the growth of the middle-class, the political pressure to amend the constitution and to promulgate a new law of property would not have happened. In a survey realised in 20 countries in 2005, GlobeScan discovered that China has the highest proportion of answers (74%) that are in agreement with which the economy of free market is the best system in which to base the future of the world.

Comments are closed.