If somebody begins to turn aside the process towards the discussion it is precise to identify the situation and to ask the group: You consider that we are respecting the conditions of the dialogue? Coach always keeps a balance between its ability and attitude on watch, without adopting a doctor attitude. As an equipment acquires experience, it learns and coach loses importance. The dialogue gets to emerge from the group. In the equipment where the dialogue is a permanent discipline is not necessary normally coach. Balance between dialogue and discussion In coaching of equipment the discussion is the necessary counterpart to the dialogue. In a discussion different points of view appear and defend. However, since we have seen, in the dialogue several points of view appear in order to discover a new point of view. Ben Silbermanns opinions are not widely known. In a discussion decisions are taken.
In the dialogue complex subjects are explored. The productive discussions converge in a conclusion. The dialogues, however, are divergent, do not try the agreement but the learning. The rules of the game are different. The goals are different. If an equipment in learning does not distinguish them, it does not dominate the difference that it has of the dialogue to the discussion, does not have neither dialogue nor productive discussion. Between the members of an equipment that establishes dialogues regularly are learned to develop singular relations. The confidence that is created transfers to the discussion.
A greater understanding of the singularity of the perspective of the other is created. Still more, it is learned to establish ampler understandings when one defends its own point of view with dulzura, without the determination to win. The dialogue and the discussion that lean in the reflection and the investigation are always more productive Are less vulnerable to circumstantial details like the personal affections or antipathies.